Filter Blogs expand_more
Blog add
Authors add
Markets add
Solutions add
Products add
Product Categories add
14 Results for 'CA/Browser Forum'
Blog

By Bruce Morton

February 21, 2019

The CA/Browser Forum continues to improve domain name validation for SSL/TLS certificates.
Blog

By Bruce Morton

February 19, 2015

Public trusted SSL uses 39 months for two purposes: certificate validity and information validation. These purposes are specified in the CA/Browser Forum Baseline Requirements.
Blog

By Bruce Morton

February 27, 2013

The CA/Browser Forum SSL Baseline Requirements have been endorsed by Mozilla and have been included in their certificate authority (CA) certificate policy.
Blog

By Chris Bailey

August 21, 2018

Entrust Datacard announces the successful transition from Method 1 domain name validation to comply with Baseline Requirement - Ballot 218 established by the CA Browser Forum.
Blog

By Bruce Morton

March 14, 2016

Entrust provides security beyond the TLS certificate. We are a strong supporter of the CA/Browser Forum standards and also support the requirements provided by our root embedding partners such as Microsoft and Mozilla. 
Blog

By Chris Bailey

June 27, 2018

The Certificate Authority Security Council (CASC) announced at the CA/Browser Forum event in London the launch of the London Protocol – an initiative to improve identity assurance and minimize the possibility of phishing activity on websites encrypted with organization validated (OV) and extended validation (EV) certificates, which contain organization identity information (Identity Certificates).
Blog

By Bruce Morton

August 19, 2015

Entrust is providing the SSL Server Compliance Timeline. This timeline will inform you of modifications to the SSL/TLS industry. The SSL Server Compliance Timeline will track industry compliance issues from the CA/Browser Forum and the browser manufacturers. The timeline will track attacks and vulnerabilities. For each item, the timeline will also advise who will take the action and when it has to be addressed. 
Blog

By Bruce Morton

March 20, 2015

Comodo issued an SSL certificate for live.fi. The issue is the certificate requester did not own or control the live.fi domain, which is owned by Microsoft. Was this Comodo’s fault? Let’s discuss. Since 2012, the certification authorities (CAs) which issue public trust SSL certificates must follow the domain verification methods in the CA/Browser Forum Baseline Requirements (BRs). The BRs provide methods for organization validation (OV) and domain validation (DV).
Blog

By Bruce Morton

March 16, 2017

Certification Authority Authorization (CAA) allows a domain owner to specify in their DNS or DNSSec which Certification Authority (CA) is authorized to issue certificates to their domain. The new CAA policy has now been defined by the CA/Browser forum and is scheduled to take effect September 8, 2017. CAA may be the best way to protect domain owners from having fraudulent certificates issued in their domain name. This has become increasingly important with the proliferation of unauthorized DV certificates.
Blog

By Bruce Morton

March 04, 2019

The CA/Browser Forum continues to update the validation methods used for issuing SSL/TLS certificates to improve security.
Page 1 of 2